[Figure: ResultsTldr]

## Overview

The internet is full of anecdotes about fixed-blade broadheads becoming
less forgiving once you get over 290 or 300 fps.

The thinking goes that these broadheads are more likely to 'plane off' as
the speed increases.

To test this, we shot several vanes and broadheads under two protocols:

- **Standard-speed:** 28&Prime;&nbsp;draw length, 70# draw weight,
  ~450gr arrows, ~290&nbsp;fps
- **High-speed:** 29&Prime;&nbsp;draw length, 80# draw weight, ~390gr
  arrows, ~325&nbsp;fps

All shots were fired indoors out of the Easton Precision Shooting Machine
at 70 yards.

We looked at overall mean radius, group sizes, and the lateral drift
between a fixed-blade broadhead and field point under simulated shooter
error.

To compare standard-speed and high-speed head-to-head we use the parity
scatters below. Each has one dot per build configuration, with its
standard-speed value on the X axis and its high-speed value on the Y
axis. The dashed line is <span class="font-mono">y = x</span>. Dots above the line performed worse on
the high-speed rig; dots below got better. Dots that hug the line are
unaffected by speed. We only show configurations that ran under both
protocols ({vanePairs.length} vane configurations and{" "}
{pointPairs.length} broadheads in this dataset).

In short:

- Dots above the dashed line = standard speed performed better
- Dots below the dashed line = high speed performed better

## Test Methods

For full details on the test methods, group capture, and analysis
processes, check out the
[Methods](/research/arrow-study-2026/methods/) page.

## Quick Tips

Hover over the dots in any plot to see the build configuration and results
details.

We lead with group size plots because they are intuitive and relatable,
but statistically speaking, mean radius is the better metric to compare.

For any plots referencing group sizes, fixed-blade drift, etc., you can
click on the dots to see the group photos annotated with mean radius and
95% confidence intervals.

## Broadhead Group Size out of a Tuned Bow

First, we shot groups of 6 arrows from a tuned bow with various broadheads
(fixed-blade and mechanical) and compared group sizes (and the more
statistically robust mean radius).

A few broadheads performed slightly better at slower speed, and some
performed slightly worse. Overall, there does not appear to be a
systematic difference in group size or mean radius between standard speed
and high speed.

[Figure: PlotSections]

## Fixed-Blade Group Size out of a Torqued Bow

As part of our restorative-lift test protocol, we shot two groups of 3
arrows (n=6) from an intentionally torqued bow for each vane build, with
Iron Will Wide fixed-blade broadheads, and compared group sizes and mean
radius.

In this case, the high-speed groups were actually a bit better for most
of the builds.

Remember, this is an Iron Will Wide broadhead, torqued to a ~1in paper
tear at 15ft, fired at ~325fps at 70 yards... and they still grouped right
in there with the ~290fps builds.

[Figure: PlotSections]

## I'm not a Machine

Group sizes out of a shooting machine are cool and all, but what about
when I make a bad shot with my broadhead?

This is where our restorative-lift protocol comes in.

We simulated archer error in a repeatable way via a lateral torque. This
is just like the torque you might apply in the heat of the moment.

We shot Iron Will Wide broadheads and field points under this same torque
condition, and then looked at how far the broadheads hit from the field
points.

Results in the parity scatter below.

[Figure: PlotSections]

## Takeaway

Inside the speed range we tested, 28&Prime;/70# at ~290&nbsp;fps vs.
29&Prime;/80# at ~325&nbsp;fps, speed does not seem to be a meaningful
driver of accuracy or forgiveness. The same components (vanes and
broadheads alike) performed about the same on both rigs, by every metric
we measured: mean radius, group size, and torque-induced broadhead drift
from field point.

Accuracy and forgiveness do not appear to be reasons to avoid fast arrows.

A few caveats:

- The arrow shafts were different between these two protocols.
- This test used different bows. (An 80# draw weight bow vs. a 70# draw
  weight bow, both Hoyt AX3 33s.)
