Arrow Ballistics Study | 2026

Plots | Front-of-Center Scatters

Two- and color-encoded three-variable scatter plots for the front-of-center matrix. They are useful for exploration, but may be misleading as effect evidence because FoC cannot be moved without also moving weight, spine, speed, or related build variables.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. FoC% (colored by shaft + spine)

Same fixed-blade lateral drift metric as the plot above (torqued field-point group vs. torqued fixed-blade group on the same build), plotted against FoC % with each point colored by its shaft + spine combination. Use this to see whether a particular shaft / stiffness pairing tracks the field point more or less truly under torque as FoC % varies. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. FoC% (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight grouped into 50-grain bands (350 to 750gr) instead of by shaft + spine. Use this to check whether arrow weight, not FoC %, is driving the fixed-blade drift relative to the field point. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Field Point Lateral Drift (Torqued vs. Untorqued) vs. FoC% (colored by shaft + spine)

Distance from the untorqued field points to the torqued field points (torqued minus untorqued, in inches). Same arrow, same shaft, same vanes, same point, only the torque condition differs. The more positive the value, the farther right the torqued field points hit; negative values mean they hit left of the untorqued ones. The induced launch torque pushes impacts left, so vanes that resist the torque keep the value closer to zero or positive. Each point is colored by its shaft + spine combination.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift (Torqued vs. Untorqued) vs. FoC% (colored by shaft + spine)

Distance from the untorqued QAD Exodus fixed-blade groups to the torqued ones (torqued minus untorqued, in inches). Same arrow, same shaft, same vanes, same broadhead, only the torque condition differs. The more positive the value, the farther right the torqued fixed-blade groups hit; negative values mean they hit left of the untorqued ones. Compare against the field-point sibling above to see whether the broadhead amplifies or damps the torque effect relative to a clean shot. Each point is colored by its shaft + spine combination.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift (Torqued vs. Untorqued) vs. FoC% (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight grouped into 50-grain bands (350 to 750gr) instead of by shaft + spine. Use this to check whether arrow weight, not FoC %, is driving the torque-induced fixed-blade drift. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Lateral Drift (Torqued vs. Untorqued) vs. FoC% (colored by point type)

Both torque-drift series on one plot: distance from the untorqued group to the torqued group (torqued minus untorqued, in inches) for both the field point and the QAD Exodus fixed blade. Same arrow, same shaft, same vanes, same point. Only the torque condition differs. Each arrow build appears twice (once per point type) so you can read the field-point and fixed-blade torque response side by side at the same FoC %. The induced launch torque pushes impacts left, so values closer to zero (or positive) mean the build resisted the torque better.

FoC | Field Point Distance from Aim Point vs. FoC% (colored by shaft + spine)

Signed lateral miss between the aim point and the torqued field-point group center, in inches. The aim point is fixed 18 inches right of each build's untorqued field-point group center, so it represents a consistent visual target across builds without anchoring to the photo-frame landmark. Positive values mean the torqued field point landed left of the aim point, negative means right (under the induced lateral torque simulating shooter error). Smaller magnitudes mean the build resisted the torque better. Each point is colored by its shaft + spine combination.

FoC | Broadhead Distance from Aim Point vs. FoC% (colored by shaft + spine)

Signed lateral miss between the aim point and the torqued QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade group center, in inches. The aim point is the same as for the field-point plot above: fixed 18 inches right of each build's untorqued field-point group center. Compare against the field-point version to see how much extra drift the broadhead adds on top of the torque-only response. Each point is colored by its shaft + spine combination.

The scatter plots below cross the five grouping / flight metrics above against FoC %, total arrow weight, shaft spine, and launch velocity. Each plot shows a weighted linear fit with the signed Pearson r in the corner (hover for details). Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. FoC%

Fixed Blade Lateral Drift (lateral distance between the torqued field-point and torqued fixed-blade groups, with the field point as the zero reference (lower is better)) vs. foc%. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. FoC% (colored by spine)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by shaft spine (discrete per spine: 200, 250, 300, 340) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether spine, not FoC %, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. FoC% (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not foc%, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. FoC%

Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. foc%. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. FoC% (colored by spine)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by shaft spine (discrete per spine: 200, 250, 300, 340) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether spine, not FoC %, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. FoC% (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not foc%, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. FoC%

Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. foc%. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. FoC% (colored by spine)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by shaft spine (discrete per spine: 200, 250, 300, 340) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether spine, not FoC %, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. FoC% (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not foc%, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. FoC%

Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. foc%. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. FoC% (colored by spine)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by shaft spine (discrete per spine: 200, 250, 300, 340) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether spine, not FoC %, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. FoC% (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not foc%, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. FoC%

Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. foc%. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. FoC% (colored by spine)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by shaft spine (discrete per spine: 200, 250, 300, 340) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether spine, not FoC %, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. FoC% (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not foc%, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. Total Arrow Weight

Fixed Blade Lateral Drift (lateral distance between the torqued field-point and torqued fixed-blade groups, with the field point as the zero reference (lower is better)) vs. total arrow weight. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Total Arrow Weight

Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. total arrow weight. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Total Arrow Weight

Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. total arrow weight. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Total Arrow Weight

Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. total arrow weight. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Total Arrow Weight

Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. total arrow weight. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. Spine

Fixed Blade Lateral Drift (lateral distance between the torqued field-point and torqued fixed-blade groups, with the field point as the zero reference (lower is better)) vs. spine. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. Spine (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. Spine (colored by FoC %)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by FoC % (10 to 24%) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether FoC %, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Spine

Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. spine. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Spine (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Spine (colored by FoC %)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by FoC % (10 to 24%) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether FoC %, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Spine

Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. spine. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Spine (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Spine (colored by FoC %)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by FoC % (10 to 24%) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether FoC %, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Spine

Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. spine. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Spine (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Spine (colored by FoC %)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by FoC % (10 to 24%) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether FoC %, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Spine

Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. spine. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Spine (colored by total arrow weight)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by total arrow weight (350 to 750gr) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether total arrow weight, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Spine (colored by FoC %)

Same data as the plot above, with each point colored by FoC % (10 to 24%) instead of the weighted fit line. Use this to check whether FoC %, not spine, is driving the trend. Each point is one arrow build.

FoC | Fixed Blade Lateral Drift vs. Launch Velocity

Fixed Blade Lateral Drift (lateral distance between the torqued field-point and torqued fixed-blade groups, with the field point as the zero reference (lower is better)) vs. launch velocity. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Launch Velocity

Untorqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. launch velocity. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Launch Velocity

Untorqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead, no torque fixture) vs. launch velocity. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius vs. Launch Velocity

Torqued Fixed Blade Mean Radius (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. launch velocity. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

FoC | Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size vs. Launch Velocity

Torqued Fixed Blade Group Size (QAD Exodus 100gr fixed-blade broadhead under induced lateral torque simulating shooter error) vs. launch velocity. Each point is one arrow build; the overlaid line is a weighted linear fit and the signed Pearson r is shown in the corner.

© 2026 Precision Cut Archery. Except where otherwise noted, content and data are licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. Non-commercial use is permitted with attribution and a link back to this site. For commercial permissions or inquiries, contact [email protected].
Precision Cut Archery Logo

Founded in 2023, Precision Cut Archery exists to empower archers to seize those rare, life-defining moments with a cold, calculated confidence.

Built 100% in the USA